"I said that?"... Being mis-quoted.
Just returned from our Business Intelligence Summit in London, the biggest and the best ever, according to the attendees. And while I felt exhausted and brain-drained every evening, I believe I still can largely remember what I said during the countless meetings with clients, vendors, and members of the press. That's why I was kinda surprised when I received the press clippings with quotes that I would have never, ever said, not in this context or any other. For example, ZDnet UK titles its article:
Gartner: It's business intelligence 2.0 timeUh. Not quite, in fact, the opposite is probably closer to what we said. I remember a few cases of vendors getting criticized for trying to add the popular 2.0 moniker to their marketing, although they wouldn't even provide 1.0 functionality. The article starts with
Forget talk of Web 2.0, it's time for BI 2.0, according to Gartner.Nope. Not sure where that quote would come from.
Speaking at the Gartner BI Summit [...], Andreas Bitterer, said the next generation of business intelligence (BI) would be defined by what it was not.I don't even know what that means, and I would never say any such thing unless I'm completely drunk, which I clearly wasn't back there on stage.
To begin with, BI 2.0 is not about more suppliers, said Bitterer. "There are too many BI vendors," he explained.Oh, my. I said nothing about BI 2.0 (in fact, I think it's nonsense), and I also didn't say that there were too many BI vendors. What I said is that organizations run BI software from too many different vendors. Slight difference.
"You cannot get one vendor's software to work with another's," he said. "They do not make it easy.Wrong again. What I explained is the difficulty to migrate reports from one vendor to another, and the vendors do not make it easy by not providing any export functionality and prohibiting reverse engineering.
Oh well, it wasn't the first time that I'm misquoted nor was it the last time. It's just strange to see, how direct quotes get spun around, causing quite a bit of confusion and potential inconsistency.


2 Comments:
Hi Andreas,
I just saw your blog by following the link at the blog of Frank Buytendijk. I hope you will post something more in the near future because I am really interested in your opinions on Business Intelligence and CPM. I have placed your link at our webste http://cpm-view.blogspot.com/
With regards,
Paul van Erk
Deloitte Consulting
Hi Andreas
I was in the media briefing that you gave in London. In my notebook, I wrote down a number of comments about BI 2.0 which I attributed to you (however, it may have been your colleague Nigel Raynor who said them). They were along the lines that a BI 2.0 product would need to have all things that a traditional product has if it were to be taken seriously -such as reporting, dashboards, scorecards, and so on. My notes concluded with a quote: "BI 2.0 - I think its nonsense".
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home